General Dynamics

Four Tech Companies that Skirt the Margin Trap

They have found ways to control pricing and keep profits flowing

 
First, some recent quarterly results. We don’t plan on getting complacent, but nearly all our Growth Portfolio picks came through with earnings in line with or better than expectations. The worst miss came from BiogenIdec. Because of various nonrecurring items, it had profits of $.24 a share vs. estimates of $.32. But we’re not fretting, given that BiogenIdec also was our best performer, vaulting well over 50 percent on news that preliminary results for its MS drug Antegren justified early filing of a drug application. Moreover, positive results from the same drug in combating Crohn’s disease were reported as well. Stocks of ours beating their estimates by 10 percent or more include Intel (see p.1), Schlumberger, Devon, and EnCana. Besides BiogenIdec the only meaningful miss was Petro-Canada, the result of higher finding costs.
Read more...

Oil and Defense: You Can’t Have One Without the Other

Defense spending is set to rise, not fall

 
Last month several Wall Street firms lowered their ratings on the defense industry. They argued growth in defense spending will soon slow and that by around 2006 spending actually will decline. Given this scenario, they projected slumping profits for military contractors.
 
We think they’re wrong, and in fact we think defense spending will almost certainly rise, benefiting dominant defense companies. Why? It’s the “e” word—energy, or, if you prefer, the “o” word, oil. In coming years, no matter what else is going on, we will need a strong military stick to ensure our access to ever more constricted energy supplies. This will propel the earnings of two of our Growth Portfolio stalwarts, Northrop Grumman and General Dynamics. Note that both these companies, like the ones profiled in the preceding article, are market dominators. But they offer the additional advantage of compelling valuations.
 
Here’s our reasoning on oil and defense. We can’t run our economy without imported oil.
Read more...

INVESTING FOR THE NEW RESOURCE WAR 08-11-08

For many, the violence that erupted in the Caucasus region last weekend seemed like a resurgence of the Cold War we long thought was over. Russia's support for the tiny regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, who were attempting to remain separated from the sovereign nation of Georgia, seems to have turned into an excuse for a full-scale Russian attack and invasion of Georgia itself.

Georgia, of course, is America's friend in Eastern Europe. We sponsored their admission into NATO, despite Russian protests. Russia has been making life difficult for the Georgians for years. However, this is not 1960 any more. We suspect today's events are less about a conflict between capitalism and communism and more about a fundamental change in the world's dynamics that is occurring today.

You may recall that the Cold War was cold because of a policy known as Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD). The threat of nuclear retaliation (and the end of life on this planet) kept the East and West from going into all-out battle with each other. That threat still exists today.Read more...

Weekly Update 10-25-04

Procter & Gamble headquarters

Image via Wikipedia

 

One of the most depressing things about the election campaign has been the lack of discussion on energy. Indeed, I can’t remember one reference to energy in the three debates – and yes despite being an avid baseball fan I did watch the debates. I know I won’t feel good about the market until energy is front and center not just on TCI subscribers’ minds but on the minds of all Americans. And trust me if it is not discussed in the political arena, it is still not an issue that is ringing big bells.Read more...